Skip to main content

Chicago

Murder, conspiracy, and extravagant musical numbers - these are some of the factors that make the film take off, garnering enough interest to earn itself an Academy Award. While it took a couple of years for me to actually sit this one through (it's just because I'm not so much into musicals - I don't think I can stress that enough in my life), the film does deliver its pizzazz, allowing the movement of the music to incorporate itself to the film. While this was based on the Broadway musical, the film literally takes the concept of Broadway when it came to the productions.

In a nutshell, the film revolves around murder and jazz music, with murderers the prime source of entertainment in the news, and the fame that goes with it. We first catch a glimpse of Vilma Kelly in one of her big production numbers, a number that she usually performs as a duo, but is actually the start of her downfall and the progression of the film. Witnessing her final performance is aspiring singer Roxie Hart, who later on in life, gets thrown into jail after murdering her lover on a fit of anger. There, she reunites with her musical idol, who at first gives her the cold shoulder. Hart's case was taken on by Billy Flynn, the same lawyer handling the Kelly case - and Hart's life turns into a surprise of glitz and glamour when Flynn started to prep her up to the press, garnering her name in papers and soon, the possibility of her living up to her dreams of being a jazz singer may actually become possible. 

The plot might have been a bit weak, in terms of probability and progression of events. While events surrounded the entertainment progress of the murders, there weren't enough variable to keep the musical performances and the actual plot connected. The plot wasn't enough to sustain the musical performances, having to thin it out in order to fit the productions right in. While I find that using the production as a means to convey story, it wasn't enough to give substance to the plot. 

Throughout the film, the lead characters led stagnant lives - who they were when they were introduced was the same as who they were after the film. While partial credit should go to the constant personality of the characters, there wasn't a bit in them that allows the viewers to sympathize, or to even like them at all. There wasn't character development - and I think in this case, it worked. They weren't meant to be liked or adorned - they knew they lived for stardom and the spotlight and wanted to be there. Not once have they demanded to be treated with dignity and respect - they wanted out of prison and to be famous, hence they did what they had to do. I wonder if there was a tinge of emotion in them, the way they're perceived and received be any different, and if it will have an impact on the film. 

The musical productions certainly stand out. The film made use of the music aspects in a Broadway format that it's not hard to imagine watching the productions play out on stage. The film stands out from the other musical films I've seen, primarily because the numbers are actual productions, with different sets of costumes, and mild to complicated dancing, as opposed to using the costumes the scene required, and incorporating the musical aspect in the said scene. In Chicago, the musical productions are the best part. Of all the leads, Catherine Zeta-Jones got the best numbers, while Richard Gere got himself glamorous ones. Renee Zellweger, on the other hand, had the slow jazz numbers. 

The leading actresses, Zeta-Jones and Zellweger were amazing - Zeta Jones in particular. Her performance always had that zest, that if she were singing on actual Broadway, I would definitely see her perform. Zellwegger played such an unlikable character in a charming way that you don't hold permanent grudges against her character. She did look flimsy next to Zeta-Jones in their final performance - I guess it's because she didn't have to bulk up, as she didn't have complicated numbers unlike her co-stars. Richard Gere and John C. Reiley were great as well - I didn't expect Reiley to have his own number, but he's certainly not going to get upstaged. I did want to learn the story of the Hungarian woman though, she played a somewhat pivotal character and we don't even know exactly what she was accused of. 

I've read some recent posts about the film and the backlash it has been given, probing me to sit down and actually watch it. I haven't read through said backlash (so feel free to inform me of the general consensus), but so far, Chicago is a great film. It's entertaining, it's lively, it provided great music, boasted from a great cast. It may not be as intricate as Moulin Rouge (a favorite of mine), but it's a gem of its own. 



Final Word: Chicago is glitz and glamour - in a good way. Amazing musical performances.

Cast: Renee Zellweger, Catherine Zeta-Jones, Richard Gere
Director: Rob Marshall
Year: 2002

Comments

  1. I like Chicago too - it's entertaining, the musical numbers are great, and like you said, Zeta-Jones looked like a Broadway star, loooved her!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. She was great, especially in her musical numbers. I don't mind watching her in Broadway!

      Delete
  2. Great to see another Chicago fan! I saw this when initially came out and it has been a top favorite ever since. What can't I say about this movie except it's amazing. :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's a great film; the musical numbers were amazing.

      Delete
  3. I really love Chicago. Like you, I'm not too big on musicals but I feel like this is one of the few that I think has a real universal appeal. It's so infectious and well produced that I think it's pretty hard to not be won over by all its charms. I'm glad you liked it!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I didn't expect to like it, but I was pretty blown away by the musical performances. They were great, and the actors were great, and it was pretty well put together.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

My Movie Alphabet Volume 2

In celebration of the 7th birthday of her blog, Mettel Ray has hosted the second round of her movie alphabet blogathon! Head over to her site and join in the fun! I participated in her first blogathon, and had a blast writing this so I was definitely in the second time around. When I first made this list, I was just thinking off the top of my head and placed a few things in there for the sake of crossing off some letters. I did end up thinking a lot for this list, and I went with things that are currently relevant to me. I also tweaked the rules a little bit, only because I don't want to let go of some of my picks. I think this list is a much clearer reflection on where I am in terms of my preferences compared to my previous years.

Thursday Movie Picks: The Renaissance (14th to 17th Century)

Thursday Movie Picks is hosted by Wandering Through the Shelves. This week’s theme is renaissance movies. I rarely watch period pieces so I had researched if I was getting the time lines right. Here are my picks for the week.

No, You're Crying! Blogathon

Debbie over at Moon in Gemini is hosting the No, YOU'RE Crying! Blogathon. The rules are simple - talk about our favorite tearjerker films! Head over to her site for a list of participants and their subsequent entries. I had a bunch of movies that made it to my short list, but ultimately decided on the movie that I keep coming back to. That is Disney's The Fox and the Hound - and it does not fail to make me cry. Note: spoilers for the movie below.