Judy

I only know Judy Garland as Dorothy in Wizard of Oz - and that is the extent of my Garland knowledge in terms of her filmography. I’ve read bits and pieces of her life in Hollywood - the pills, the long hours, the scrutiny because she was a Hollywood darling - but I wasn’t really sure what happened to her after her childhood years. I did end up reading her wikipedia page, and to be honest, her page was a bit similar to watching the film. (Spoilers)

The film focuses on Judy’s last years as a performer interspersed with her teen years as an actress. Judy has been divorced many times, is homeless and in debt, taking her chances in London in order to provide for her children. She was also in the receiving end of substance abuse, always with a drink in hand. She was also difficult to work with; she was late, she was drunk, she had a lot of complaints about everything. However, despite all her fuss, once she was thrusted into the spotlight, she was a star. Judy Garland was a performer at heart. She was the performer everyone was enthralled with, that it didn’t really matter about the woman outside the stage. She was a beloved performer, and that was that. 

The film did show her more general issues - the ones everyone knows about - but nothing much else behind the shell of the person. We get scenes of how torturous people in show business treated her, and that her mindset has been tweaked to think of everyone just taking advantage of her because she is a commodity. Everyone in her life seemed to ignore all the warning signs in her life because of her name, with people simply going along with her antics because she brings in the money. There were moments where she was alone or was in some state, and while it’s supposed to show us the humanity of Judy in a world of fame, we don’t really get much understanding from the mindset of the actress. 

One factor that can be derived from the biopic is that Hollywood has made her who she was. She was given substances to adjust her mechanisms - when she was young, it was pills, switched to alcohol during her older years. She was someone who was sabotaged by so many people, that the well-intentioned part of her couldn’t salvage what was left of her. She was someone who was emotionally manipulated as a child, so she found the affection she was looking for through the only way she knew: by being the Judy Garland. Scenes of her looking for affection were evident throughout the film - marrying her husband on a whim because he adored her, joining a couple for dinner because they adored her, always communicating with the people waiting for her by the theater because they adored her. She needed that companionship, that need for acceptance, and was given none of that when she wasn’t performing. 

In terms of showing a biopic, the film did present a detailed background of Garland’s life, only choosing to showcase two aspects to contain storytelling. It did compliment each other because it provided scenarios whose effects are similar to both points of life - despite her age and fame, she was still in the same situation, and that her life only seems to go in a loop. Renee Zellweger gave a fantastic performance at Garland in her later years. However, the film was a bit distant in the treatment of Garland’s story. I didn’t get much emotion from it, even from the scene that I think the film was counting on to be its big moment. I really thought that scene was supposed to pack this big emotional punch to culminate the entire experience Garland has gone through. It had everything - the song choice, the audience who weren’t jaded with the persona Garland has been projecting, the wonderful performance of Zellweger, but it just fell short. 

All in all, it has the formula a biopic is composed of, and it did make you think of Garland’s state behind the scene, but the treatment of the story was a bit surface level. It could have used more depth and warmth, considering the other factors of her life.

7 comments:

  1. I don't know a lot about Garland either but I plan on watching more of her movies this year. I thought it was fine. Not the best biopic out there but it worked well enough for me.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. In terms of what makes a biopic, the details seem to be present, but it was really just that, and nothing more. I doubt this would be remembered in a few years time.

      Delete
  2. I wasn’t familiar with Garland so what the film shows was all new to be. That said, I was never compelled by it and I didn’t feel any sort of emotion other than boredom. Zellweger does give a great performance though. But I truly hope she won’t win because there are more deserving actresses nominated.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This year's awards season is a bit boring because everyone seems to be a lock in their category. The film just went through the motions of a biopic, but I would have wanted it to look much deeper into Garland's life.

      Delete
  3. I haven't seen this because of the reviews saying more or less what you have, that's its mediocre and never captures the true Judy. Plus there is my aversion to all things Zellweger.

    I've read many books about her, including daughter Lorna Luft's-a fascinating peek into what life is like growing up with a famous troubled parent, and have seen all her films and her deeply complex story nor her uniqueness just is impossible to capture on film.

    There was a mini-series several years ago with Judy Davis & Tammy Blanchard playing her at different ages that did well approximating her story but the true woman will always remain elusive. She isn't known as the World's Greatest Entertainer for nothing.

    The best way to become acquainted with her is through her films. Like all great studio stars she made her share of average pictures, though never any truly bad ones. But because of who she was and her level of talent after Oz she was THE musical queen of MGM (not that that stopped them from working her to exhaustion and beyond) and her films were made with the highest level of care.

    Any of her films post Oz where she's the star are worth seeing but to get near her essence I'd recommend these, at least for starters.

    Ziegfeld Girl shows her at her youthful perky best. She has two great numbers in it, one intimate and one lavish plus you get Lana Turner, Hedy Lamarr and Jimmy Stewart too.

    Meet Me in St. Louis-Where she came into her own as a young woman. Great production and cast plus The Trolley Song and Have Yourself a Merry Little Christmas which was written especially for her.

    Easter Parade-Her only pairing with Fred Astaire (others were planned but her health prevented them) shows her skill as a comedienne.

    Summer Stock-Her final MGM film. It was hell to make (scheduled for six weeks it took six months) and her weight fluctuates from scene to scene but she's breezy and paired with Gene Kelly she's once again wonderfully magnetic. She and Kelly perform a challenge dance that shows off what a strong dancer she could be as well.

    A Star is Born-Her comeback vehicle and its a WOW. She's aged about 10 years in the four years between this and Summer Stock but this gives full range to her dramatic ability as well as her musical gifts. A word of warning the film was heavily cut after its premiere to allow more screenings and for years the footage was thought to be lost but a major restoration took place in the 80's after the full soundtrack was found, including several musical numbers, but especially in the first part the narrative is pieced together with stills to replace the lost scenes. It's easier to deal with knowing about that going in. She was Oscar nominated and should have won.

    Judgement at Nuremburg-She doesn't sing a note but is cast as a Nazi survivor who was sterilized during the war and is now testifying at the trials. Another Oscar nomination.

    I Could Go On Singing-Her final film and the closest to her backstage life. She's a lonely singer in London trying to reconnect with the man she had loved long before and the child she had given up to him who isn't aware she's his real mother. The musical scenes are the closest you'll ever get to what she was like in live performance and they are compelling even if she's not always looking her best.

    Hope you give some of them a whirl!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for all the recommendations! I'll give them a try.

      Delete
  4. Nice review! I'm a big fan of Judy's, and was happy the movie went in a traditional route. The play the movie is based on is a hot mess, and a lot of the script was close to what things were like at the time. The movie wouldn't be the same without Renee though.

    ReplyDelete